Good Reading: Joint Editorial by Vicente Montesinos, Francisco Bendala, and Enrique de Diego (in Spanish)

EDITORIAL CONJUNTO

Vicente Montesinos, Adoración y Liberación.

Francisco Bendala, El Español Digital.

Enrique de Diego, Rambla Libre.

 

    Nosotros, representando a tres digitales católicos que implican a buena parte de la opinión pública católica de España, hacemos un llamamiento a los cardenales y obispos que no reconocen al Falso Profeta como Papa; que no están unidos “una Cum” Bergoglio; y que se mantienen fieles a la fe en Nuestro Señor Jesucristo, y devotos de la Sagrada Eucaristía, para que asuman las tremendas circunstancias de este momento histórico de general apostasía.

    Así mismo llamamos a todos aquellos que todavía reconocen a Bergoglio como Papa, a unirse al anterior selecto grupo, para poder así de forma legítima lleva a cabo lo que les vamos a pedir.

    Hay que convocar un Cónclave que dote a la Iglesia Católica de un verdadero Papa. La Iglesia es la Comunión de los Santos, con los Santos y los Mártires y todos cuantos nos han precedido en el Reino de los Cielos. Y la Iglesia sufre con este tremendo desorden, con esta general apostasía de Jorge Mario Bergoglio, muchos cardenales, muchos obispos y muchos sacerdotes.

    La apostasía es general. Nos va el alma en comprender el problema y asumir nuestra responsabilidad. No sólo es Jorge Mario Bergoglio, sino que satanás domina el Vaticano y el conjunto de la jerarquía de las diversas naciones. Bergoglio es un falso Papa que manipuló el Cónclave con la mafia de San Galo, con lo que está excomulgado latae sententiae, según norma dictada en la Universi Dominici Gregis por San Juan Pablo II, sin que ninguna autoridad eclesiástica tenga que dictarla, en el momento que se produce tan grave pecado contra el Espíritu Santo, que no se perdona.

    Todos sus actos, nombramientos y cancelaciones son inválidos.

    El falso magisterio de la Iglesia en los tiempos sombríos presentes está sometido a los poderes satánicos globalistas.

    Se predica una falsa religión, que nada tiene que ver con el Cristianismo y con la salvación de las almas, sino con su perdición, de disolución moral que se asemeja a la herejía nicolaíta, que Dios abomina en el Apocalipsis, de negación de las verdades fundamentales de la Fe, en un nuevo irenismo, con la difusión de groseras mentiras como el timo cambio climático, el favorecimiento de la invasión islámica, e incluso la coacción por la falsa jerarquía de las conciencias a favor de la timo vacunación, que ha representado millones de muertes y decenas de millones de enfermos dolientes por sus efectos adversos, en una locura satánica que ha sido descrita por el infame Bergoglio como un “acto de amor” y seguido por muchos cardenales no sólo haciendo apología del genocidio, sino directamente promoviéndolo, cerrando Iglesias, imponiendo normas absurdas y sacrílegas como dar la Sagrada Comunión en la mano.

    Se quiere convertir a la Iglesia en una ONG al servicio de la malvada y satánica agenda 2030, con la que unas élites depravadas quieren esclavizar al mundo y exterminar a la especie humana.

    El tiempo urge para la celebración de un Cónclave legítimo y válido, mientras se suceden las cancelaciones de los buenos pastores, sin más razón que el hecho de que defienden el Evangelio.

    Los pastores están para defender al pueblo de Dios y oponerse a los designios genocidas de las élites globalistas, no para entregarles al exterminio por la codicia de unas farmacéuticas dispuestas a extender el dolor y la muerte. Este grave pecado personal y colectivo de la jerarquía clama al Cielo y a la Justicia divina y exige extrema reparación.

    Nosotros, católicos corrientes, hacemos un llamamiento frente a estos clérigos mundanizados, al sensum fidei de los católicos para que busquen a buenos clérigos, a los que no se hallan en comunión con el Falso Profeta, de forma que re-orienten su vida cristiana y la recepción de los Sacramentos, regalos de Jesús para nuestra salvación, y no se dejen llevar por este vendaval de la herejía modernista –“compendio de todas las herejías”, al decir de San Pío X en su Encíclica Pascendi- que trata de destruir la Iglesia y el mundo entero.

    Renovamos nuestra fe bautismal de que los poderes del infierno no prevalecerán sobre la Iglesia. Somos conscientes de que nos jugamos el alma si nos callamos y no demostramos nuestro Amor sin fisuras a Nuestro Señor Jesucristo.

    Nos acogemos a la protección de la Virgen María, Madre de Dios y Madre nuestra, para que, por su intercesión, se acorte el tiempo de la prueba. A Ella, Inmaculada Concepción, Señora de todos los pueblos, Corredentora, Abogada y Medianera de todas las Gracias, acudimos seguros para que triunfe la Comunión de los Santos y todos los que nos precedieron durante más de dos mil años. También a San José, Protector de la Iglesia, terror de los demonios. A San Miguel Arcángel, príncipe de la Milicia Celestial, para que devuelva a los demonios que andan por el mundo tratando de perder las almas, y especialmente a los que invaden la Iglesia y ensombrecen la Roca de Pedro con la iniquidad que domina el Vaticano.

 

    ¡Ven, Señor, no tardes!

 

    

 

    Vicente Montesinos, Adoración y Liberación,

    Francisco Bendala, El Español Digital,

    Enrique de Diego, Rambla Libre.

 

    España, 25 de Diciembre del Año del Señor de 2023

    Natividad de Nuestro Señor Jesucristo

Good Reading: "A New Ethic for Medicine and Society" (in English)

  editorial from CALIFORNIA MEDICINE, September 1970.

 

The TRADITIONAL WESTERN ethic has always placed great emphasis on the intrinsic worth and equal value of every human life regardless of its stage or condition. This ethic has had the blessing of the Judeo- Christian heritage and has been the basis for most of our laws and much of our social policy. The reverence for each and every human life has also been a keystone of Western medicine and is the ethic which has "caused physicians to try to preserve, protect, repair, prolong and enhance every human life which comes under their surveillance. This traditional ethic is still clearly dominant, but there is much to suggest that it is being eroded at its core and may eventually even be abandoned. This of course will produce profound changes in Western medicine and in Western society.

 There are certain new facts and social realities which are becoming recognized, are widely discussed in Western society and seem certain to undermine and transform this traditional ethic. They have come into being and into focus as the social by-products of unprecedented technologic progress and achievement. Of particular importance are; first, the demographic data of human population expansion which tends to proceed uncontrolled and at a geometric rate of progression; second, an ever growing ecological disparity between the numbers of people and the resources available to support these numbers in the manner to which they are or would like to become accustomed; and third, and perhaps most important, a quite new social emphasis on something which is beginning to be called the quality of life, a something which becomes possible for the first time in human history because of scientific and technologic development. These are now being seen by a growing segment of the public as realities which are within the power of humans to control and there is quite evidently an increasing determination to do this.

What is not yet so clearly perceived is that in order to bring this about hard choices will have to be made with respect to what is to be preserved and strengthened and what is not, and that this will of necessity violate and ultimately destroy the traditional Western ethic with all that this portends. It will become necessary and acceptable to place relative rather than absolute values on such things as human lives, the use of scarce resources and the various elements which are to make up the quality of life or of living which is to be sought. This is quite distinctly at variance with the Judeo- Christian ethic and carries serious philosophical, social, economic and political implications for Western society and perhaps for world society.

 The process of eroding the old ethic and substituting the new has already begun. It may be seen most clearly in changing attitudes toward human abortion. In defiance of the long held Western ethic of intrinsic and equal value for every human life regardless of its stage, condition or status, abortion is becoming accepted by society as moral, right and even necessary. It is worth noting that this shift in public attitude has affected the churches, the laws and public policy rather than the reverse. Since the old ethic has not yet been fully displaced it has been necessary to separate the idea. of abortion from the idea of killing, which continues to be socially abhorrent. The result has been a curious avoidance of the scientific fact, which everyone really knows, that human life begins at conception and is continuous whether intra- or extra-uterine until death. The very considerable semantic gymnastics which are required to rationalize abortion as anything but taking a human life would be ludicrous if they were not often put forth under socially impeccable auspices. It is suggested that this schizophrenic sort of subterfuge is necessary because while a new ethic is being accepted the old one has not yet been rejected.

It seems safe to predict that the new demographic, ecological and social realities and aspirations are so powerful that the new ethic of relative rather than of absolute and equal values will ultimately prevail as man exercises ever more certain and effective control over his numbers, and uses his always comparatively scarce resources to provide the nutrition, housing, economic support, education and health care in such I ways as to achieve his desired quality of life and living. The criteria upon which these relative values are to be based will depend considerably upon whatever concept of the quality of life or living is developed. This may be expected to reflect the extent that quality of life is considered to be a function of personal fulfillment; of individual responsibility for the common welfare, the preservation of the environment, the betterment of the species; and of whether or not, or to what extent, these responsibilities are to be exercised on a compulsory or voluntary basis.

The part which medicine will play as all this develops is not yet entirely clear. That it will be deeply involved is certain. Medicine's role with respect to changing attitudes toward abortion may well be a prototype of what is to occur. Another precedent may be found in the part physicians have played in evaluating who is and who is not to be given costly long-term renal dialysis. Certainly this has required placing relative values on human lives and the impact of the physician to this decision process has been considerable. One may anticipate further development of these roles as the problems of birth control and birth selection are extended inevitably to death selection and death control whether by the individual or by society, and further public and professional determinations of when and when not to use scarce resources.

 Since the problems which the new demographic, ecologic and social realities pose are fundamentally biological and ecological in nature and pertain to the survival and well-being of human beings, the participation of physicians and of the medical profession will be essential in planning and decision-making at many levels. No other discipline has the knowledge of human nature, human behavior, health and disease, and of what is involved in physical and mental well- being which will be needed. It is not too early for our profession to examine this new ethic, recognize it for what it is and will mean to human society, and prepare to apply it in a rational development for the fulfillment and betterment of mankind in what is almost certain to be a biologically oriented world society.